|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Copper-Rotor Motors Built, Tested in India
Field Experience Shows Motors Gain Efficiency, Run Cooler
(continued)
Results from tests on two of the 2-pole motors are shown in Tables 1 and 2 and on two 4-pole motors in Tables 3 and 4. As expected, the higher conductivity (copper) rotor material increased speed slightly (i.e., slip is reduced), and efficiency is increased by between about 1.3 and nearly four percentage points, a rather remarkable improvement considering that the motors hadn’t been optimized for copper. However, because copper's higher conductivity was not taken into account in the motor's slot design, there was a reduction in locked rotor torque (Table 5).4
|
 |
|
Table 1. Test Results for 2-hp (1.5-kW), 415-V, 2-pole, 3-phase, 50-Hz Motors, Copper and Aluminum Rotors
|
| Rotor Material |
Load, % |
Input Power, W |
Speed, rpm |
Efficiency, % |
| Copper |
100 |
1824 |
2949 |
82.54 |
| Aluminum |
100 |
1856 |
2926 |
81.14 |
| Copper |
75 |
1440 |
2955 |
79.19 |
| Aluminum |
75 |
1456 |
2940 |
77.80 |
|
 |
|
Table 2. Test Results for 5-hp (3.7-kW), 415-V, 2-pole, 3-phase, 50-Hz Motors, Copper and Aluminum Rotors
|
| Rotor Material |
Load, % |
Input Power, W |
Speed, rpm |
Efficiency, % |
| Copper |
100 |
4256 |
2947 |
87.09 |
| Aluminum |
100 |
4496 |
2925 |
83.99 |
| Copper |
75 |
3232 |
2960 |
85.99 |
| Aluminum |
75 |
3408 |
2935 |
82.19 |
|
 |
|
Table 3. Test Results for 3-hp (2.2-kW), 415-V, 4-pole, 3-phase, 50-Hz-Motors, Copper and Aluminum Rotors
|
| Rotor Material |
Load, % |
Input Power, W |
Speed, rpm |
Efficiency, % |
| Copper |
100 |
2600 |
1451 |
85.88 |
| Aluminum |
100 |
2660 |
1411 |
83.55 |
| Copper |
75 |
1960 |
1465 |
84.15 |
| Aluminum |
75 |
2040 |
1433 |
82.82 |
|
 |
|
Table 4. Test Results for 5-hp (3.7-kW), 415-V, 4-pole, 3-phase, 50-Hz Motors, Copper and Aluminum Rotors
|
| Rotor Material |
Load, % |
Input Power, W |
Speed, rpm |
Efficiency, % |
| Copper |
100 |
4344 |
1469 |
85.97 |
| Aluminum |
100 |
4544 |
1429 |
83.01 |
| Copper |
75 |
3280 |
1473 |
84.54 |
| Aluminum |
75 |
3400 |
1443 |
82.56 |
|
 |
|
Table 5. Locked Rotor Torque and Temperature Rise in 2- and 4-pole Motors with Copper and Aluminum Rotors
|
| hp (Kw) |
Poles |
Rotor Material |
Locked Rotor Torque, % of rated torque |
Temp. Rise, °C (°F) |
| 2 (1.5) |
2 |
Cu |
406.2 |
39.6 1,2 (103.3) |
| 2 (1.5) |
2 |
Al |
442.2 |
36.8 1 (98.2) |
| 5 (3.7) |
2 |
Cu |
174.0 |
66.7 1 (152.1) |
| 5 (3.7) |
2 |
Al |
260.9 |
80.1 1 (176.2) |
| 3 (2.2) |
4 |
Cu |
242.4 |
57.7 (135.9) |
| 3 (2.2) |
4 |
Al |
268.4 |
68.8 (155.8) |
| 5 (3.7) |
4 |
Cu |
168.4 |
61.8 (143.24) |
| 5 (3.7) |
4 |
Al |
205.2 |
68.9 (156.0) |
1 Measured at reduced voltage (353 V).
2 No cooling fins on this die-cast copper rotor.
|
|
 |
|
 |
MORE >>
|
|